Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.1 | 84.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| OnePlus | LG |
| Android 10 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-12-06 | 2019-04-11 |
| 6.40 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches | 5.98 x 2.83 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.41 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Papaya orange | Aurora black, Carmine red and Platinum gray |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 432.00 | $ 215.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 513 pixels per inch | 563 pixels per inch |
| -- | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 17.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4085mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG G8 ThinQ has a score of 84.3, which is slightly better than OnePlus 7T Pro 5G McLaren's 80.1 score. Although LG G8 ThinQ and the OnePlus 7T Pro 5G McLaren were released with only 8 months difference, LG G8 ThinQ is just a little thinner and notably lighter. Both of these phones come with Android OS, but the LG G8 ThinQ has 9.0 Pie version while OnePlus 7T Pro 5G McLaren has Android 10.
OnePlus 7T Pro 5G McLaren counts with a bit superior CPU than LG G8 ThinQ, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the OnePlus 7T Pro 5G McLaren also has more RAM memory. LG G8 ThinQ has just a bit better looking display than OnePlus 7T Pro 5G McLaren, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, and they both have the same exact resolution of 1440 x 3120 pixels, the LG G8 ThinQ also counts with a just a little higher quantity of pixels in each inch in the screen.
LG G8 ThinQ features a much bigger memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than OnePlus 7T Pro 5G McLaren, because although it has less internal memory, it also counts with a SD memory slot that supports up to 1,95 TB. The OnePlus 7T Pro 5G McLaren has a better camera than LG G8 ThinQ, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not good for shooting images and videos in low-light environments, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution and the same 60 fps video frame rate, the OnePlus 7T Pro 5G McLaren also counts with a lot larger sensor which provides a much better image and video quality and a camera in the back with a way better resolution.
The OnePlus 7T Pro 5G McLaren counts with longer battery performance than LG G8 ThinQ, because it has a 17 percent bigger battery capacity.
LG G8 ThinQ is not only the best phones of the ones we are comparing, but it's also by far the cheapest one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.