Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.1 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| OnePlus | Motorola |
| Android 10 | Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2019-12-06 | 2016-09-01 |
| 6.40 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches | 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches |
| 7.41 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Papaya orange | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Metal | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 432.00 | $ 250.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 513 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 17.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4085mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
OnePlus 7T Pro 5G McLaren has a score of 80.1, which is a bit better than the Moto Z Force's global score of 75.8. OnePlus 7T Pro 5G McLaren's construction is much newer, but way heavier and somewhat thicker than Moto Z Force. Both of these phones include Android OS (operating system), but OnePlus 7T Pro 5G McLaren has older 10 version and Moto Z Force has Android 7.0 Nougat version.
OnePlus 7T Pro 5G McLaren has a little more vivid screen than Moto Z Force, because although it has a quite worse pixels density, it also counts with a bigger display and a quite better resolution of 1440 x 3120 pixels. Moto Z Force features a quite bigger storage for apps and games than OnePlus 7T Pro 5G McLaren, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external SD slot that admits up to 1,95 TB.
The OnePlus 7T Pro 5G McLaren counts with a bit better hardware performance than Moto Z Force, because it has more RAM and a greater number of faster cores. The OnePlus 7T Pro 5G McLaren counts with a better camera than Motorola Moto Z Force, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the OnePlus 7T Pro 5G McLaren also has a back-facing camera with much more mega-pixels, higher 60 fps video frame rate and a larger aperture for better low-light photography.
The OnePlus 7T Pro 5G McLaren has longer battery life than Moto Z Force, because it has 4085mAh of battery capacity against 3500mAh.
Although OnePlus 7T Pro 5G McLaren is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Moto Z Force, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Moto Z Force. So if you want that extra features, you can buy the OnePlus 7T Pro 5G McLaren, but if you don't you can save a couple dollars and buy the Moto Z Force, giving up some features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.