Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.1 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| OnePlus | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2019-12-06 | 2016-06-10 |
| 6.40 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches | 5.86 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches |
| 7.41 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Papaya orange | Camo green, Sandy gold and Titanium gray |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Metal | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 432.00 | $ 247.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 513 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.81 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 17.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4085mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The OnePlus 7T Pro 5G McLaren is a little bit better than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, having an 80.1 score against 75.8. The OnePlus 7T Pro 5G McLaren body is incredibly newer and thinner, but also heavier than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active. The Galaxy S7 Active counts with a little bit better screen than OnePlus 7T Pro 5G McLaren, because although it has a quite lower 1440 x 2560 resolution and a way smaller display, it also counts with a little more pixels per screen inch.
The OnePlus 7T Pro 5G McLaren counts with a much greater storage capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage. OnePlus 7T Pro 5G McLaren features a better performance than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because it has more RAM and a larger number of cores (and they are faster).
The OnePlus 7T Pro 5G McLaren features just a bit better battery lifetime than Galaxy S7 Active, because it has a 4085mAh battery size against 4000mAh. The OnePlus 7T Pro 5G McLaren takes way better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the OnePlus 7T Pro 5G McLaren also has faster video frame rate, a much better 48 mega pixels resolution camera in the back and a larger aperture to capture better low-light photography and video.
Although OnePlus 7T Pro 5G McLaren is a better device, it is way more expensive than Galaxy S7 Active, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Galaxy S7 Active. If you prefer to save a few dollars, you can get Galaxy S7 Active, letting go a couple features and specs, but you will get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.