Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.1 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| OnePlus | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2019-12-06 | 2020-04-04 |
| 6.40 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 7.41 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| Papaya orange | Black |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Metal | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 432.00 | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | -- |
| 513 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 17.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.99 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4085mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
OnePlus 7T Pro 5G McLaren is a little bit better than the Galaxy XCover FieldPro, with a global score of 80.1 against 80.1. Both phones in this comparison review use Android OS, but OnePlus 7T Pro 5G McLaren has the previous 10 version while Galaxy XCover FieldPro has Android 8.0 Oreo version. OnePlus 7T Pro 5G McLaren is a lighter and noticeably thinner phone than the Galaxy XCover FieldPro, even though both were only released with a couple months difference.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a little sharper screen than OnePlus 7T Pro 5G McLaren, because although it has a much smaller screen and a little worse resolution of 1440 x 2560, it also counts with a just a little greater pixel density. OnePlus 7T Pro 5G McLaren has just a bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the OnePlus 7T Pro 5G McLaren also has a higher amount of RAM.
The OnePlus 7T Pro 5G McLaren counts with a bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity. Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a little better battery performance than OnePlus 7T Pro 5G McLaren, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 4085mAh.
The OnePlus 7T Pro 5G McLaren counts with a very superior camera than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a tinier aperture, it also counts with a way bigger camera sensor taking way better quality pictures, a much higher 3840x2160 video definition and a back facing camera with way more megapixels.
OnePlus 7T Pro 5G McLaren not only is the best phones of the ones we are comparing, but it's also by far the cheapest, which makes this phone an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.