Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| OnePlus | Samsung |
| -- | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2019-10-18 | 2020-04-04 |
| 6.40 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 7.27 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| Haze blue | Black |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Metal | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 432.00 | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | -- |
| 513 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 17.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.99 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4085mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a global score of 80.1, which is just a bit better than the OnePlus 7T Pro's 75.8 score. Even though Galaxy XCover FieldPro is a better cellphone than OnePlus 7T Pro, we must highlight that it is also notably thicker and heavier. The Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a bit sharper screen than OnePlus 7T Pro, because although it has a much smaller screen and a little lower 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution, it also counts with a quite higher pixels density.
OnePlus 7T Pro features a quite bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage. The OnePlus 7T Pro has just a little better processing power than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, and although they both have the same number of cores, the OnePlus 7T Pro also has a larger amount of RAM.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with just a bit longer battery lifetime than OnePlus 7T Pro, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity. The OnePlus 7T Pro features a lot better camera than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a tinier camera aperture, it also counts with a lot better resolution camera, a way better (4K) video resolution and a lot larger back camera sensor taking much higher quality videos and pictures.
Although Galaxy XCover FieldPro is a better device, it costs a lot more than OnePlus 7T Pro, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the OnePlus 7T Pro. If you want to save a few dollars, you can get OnePlus 7T Pro, giving up a couple features, but you will get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.