Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 90.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| OnePlus | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2019-10-18 | 2021-08-11 |
| 6.40 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches | 6.23 x 5.04 x 0.25 inches |
| 7.27 ounces | 9.56 ounces |
| Haze blue | Phantom Black, Phantom Green and Phantom Silver |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Metal | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 432.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 513 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 17.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.99 | 7.7 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4085mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4400mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Fold 3 is better than the OnePlus 7T Pro, getting a overall score of 90.6 against 75.8. The Galaxy Z Fold 3 body is newer and much thinner than the OnePlus 7T Pro's, but it's noticeably heavier. The OnePlus 7T Pro and the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 count with very similar CPUs, and although the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 has more RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
OnePlus 7T Pro counts with a slightly better screen than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a bit higher 1440 x 3120px resolution and a higher screen density. The OnePlus 7T Pro captures much clearer photos and videos than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has a much more megapixels back-facing camera and a much larger diafragm aperture to capture better low light captures and videos.
The Galaxy Z Fold 3's memory capacity to install applications and games is very similar to the OnePlus 7T Pro one, both have the same internal memory. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 counts with just a little better battery life than OnePlus 7T Pro, because it has 4400mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.