Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| OnePlus | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2019-10-18 | 2020-04-04 |
| 6.34 x 2.93 x 0.32 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 6.70 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| Frosted silver and Glacier blue | Black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 248.00 | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | -- |
| 405 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.99 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3800mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.76 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a score of 80.1, which is much better than the OnePlus 7T's 72.2 overall score. Both of these devices work with Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has 8.0 Oreo version and OnePlus 7T has Android 11, so it counts with lots of additional features. Even being the best in this review, we must note that it is also a noticeably thicker and incredibly heavier cellphone.
The OnePlus 7T counts with a bit better hardware performance than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, and although they both have the same number of cores, the OnePlus 7T also has a larger amount of RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a bit more vivid display than OnePlus 7T, because although it has a much smaller display, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2560px and a greater display density.
Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a quite bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than OnePlus 7T, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external SD slot that supports up to 512 GB. The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has just a bit better battery life than OnePlus 7T, because it has an 18% greater battery capacity.
The OnePlus 7T captures a lot better photographs and videos than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not nice for low light photos, it also counts with a much more megapixels back camera, a much higher (4K) video resolution and a way larger camera sensor.
Although Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro is a better device, it costs a lot more money than OnePlus 7T, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the OnePlus 7T. So if you want that extra features, you can buy the Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, else you can save some dollars and get the OnePlus 7T, letting go a couple specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.