Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.9 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| OnePlus | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-04-29 | 2020-01-31 |
| 6.31 x 2.87 x 0.31 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Onyx black and Polar silver | Black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 800.00 | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 405 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Kryo 585 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.16 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy XCover Pro is a bit better than OnePlus 8 UW, having an 81 score against 75.9. Both phones in this comparison review include Android operating system, but the Galaxy XCover Pro has 11 version and OnePlus 8 UW has Android 10 version, so it provides some nice extra features. Despite being the best in this comparison review, the Galaxy XCover Pro construction is extremely thicker and heavier than the OnePlus 8 UW.
OnePlus 8 UW has a better display than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a bit lower display density, it also counts with a bit bigger screen and a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2400px. The Galaxy XCover Pro counts with more storage to install games and applications than OnePlus 8 UW, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that admits a maximum of 512 GB.
The OnePlus 8 UW has a little better performance than Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have the same number of cores, the OnePlus 8 UW also has a larger amount of RAM. The OnePlus 8 UW features just a little bit longer battery performance than Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has 4300mAh of battery capacity against 4050mAh.
The OnePlus 8 UW has a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a tinier aperture, it also counts with a much larger back-facing camera sensor shooting lot better quality photos and videos, a way more mega-pixels camera and a much better (4K) video definition.
Even being the best phone of the ones in this comparison, Galaxy XCover Pro is also by far the cheapest, which makes it very easy to pick between these devices.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.