Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 65.7 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | LG |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-04-29 | 2018-06-08 |
| 6.38 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Aurora Purple and Twilight Black | Black and Gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 250.00 | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Hexa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 4.2 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V35 ThinQ is much better than OPPO A72, getting a overall score of 81.3 against 65.7. Although LG V35 ThinQ is older than the OPPO A72, it's design is lighter and somewhat thinner. The LG V35 ThinQ features a bit more vivid screen than OPPO A72, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2880 resolution and more pixels per inch in the screen.
LG V35 ThinQ features just a bit better processing power than OPPO A72, because it has 2 more cores and a greater amount of RAM memory. LG V35 ThinQ counts with a superior memory to install games and applications than OPPO A72, because although it has less internal storage, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The OPPO A72 has a much longer battery duration than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has a 52% larger battery size. OPPO A72 counts with a better camera than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a smaller camera aperture, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the OPPO A72 also counts with a lot bigger sensor taking much higher quality pictures and videos and a lot more mega pixels camera in the back.
LG V35 ThinQ costs a little more money than the OPPO A72, but you can get a much better phone for that extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.