Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 65.7 | 72.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Motorola |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-04-29 | 2020-06-12 |
| 6.38 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches | 6.37 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 6.68 ounces |
| Aurora Purple and Twilight Black | Pearl white |
| -- | Plastic |
| $ 250.00 | $ 200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1560 x 720 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 405 pixels per inch | 268 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Hexa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 9.84 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 4.2 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Moto G Fast has a score of 72.2, which is a little bit better than OPPO A72's general score of 65.7. Both of these devices come with Android OS, but Moto G Fast has a newer 11 version while OPPO A72 has Android 10, so it provides you some nice extra features and better performance. The Moto G Fast design is just a bit thicker but just a bit lighter than OPPO A72, and they were released only 1 months apart.
The OPPO A72 counts with a much better display than Moto G Fast, because it has a much better 1080 x 2400 resolution, a bit larger screen and a much greater pixel amount per display inch. OPPO A72 features a slightly bigger storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Moto G Fast, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage capacity.
The Motorola Moto G Fast has a bit superior processor than OPPO A72, because although it has lesser RAM memory, it also counts with more CPU cores. The OPPO A72 counts with superior battery performance than Motorola Moto G Fast, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity. The OPPO A72 shoots better pictures and videos than Motorola Moto G Fast, and although they both have the same camera aperture, the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the OPPO A72 also has a much bigger back camera sensor shooting way higher quality videos and photos and a camera with way more mega pixels.
Even being the best phone of the ones we are comparing, the Moto G Fast is also by far the cheapest, making it an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.