Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | HTC |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-05-03 | 2017-02-21 |
| 6.30 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches | 6.39 x 3.14 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.10 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| Cosmo Blue and Fluid Black | 16 777 216 |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | S-LCD 5 |
| 411 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 800U MT6853 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset |
| Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC3 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.45 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4310mAh Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.16 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
HTC U Ultra is slightly better than the OPPO A94 5G, with a 77 score against 74.1. HTC U Ultra's construction has the same thickness than OPPO A94 5G, but it's just a little lighter. The OPPO A94 5G features a little bit better looking screen than HTC U Ultra, because although it has a little bit less pixels per inch in the screen and a little bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2400px, it also counts with a little larger screen.
HTC U Ultra counts with much more memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than OPPO A94 5G, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with an external memory card slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. OPPO A94 5G counts with a bit more powerful processor than HTC U Ultra, because it has a greater number of cores and 4 GB more RAM.
OPPO A94 5G captures much clearer photographs and videos than HTC U Ultra, and although they both have the same video quality and the same video frame rate, the OPPO A94 5G also has a larger aperture for better images and video in poorly lited situations, a way better 48 mega pixels resolution back camera and a bigger sensor providing a better image quality.
OPPO A94 5G features a superior battery duration than HTC U Ultra, because it has 4310mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.