Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | LG |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-05-03 | 2018-06-08 |
| 6.30 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.10 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Cosmo Blue and Fluid Black | Black and Gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 800U MT6853 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC3 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4310mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.16 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V35 ThinQ is slightly better than OPPO A94 5G, getting an 81.3 score against 74.1. Despite of the fact that LG V35 ThinQ is much older than OPPO A94 5G, it's design is a little lighter and just a little bit thinner. The OPPO A94 5G and the LG V35 ThinQ feature incredibly similar displays, because although the LG V35 ThinQ has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2880 and more pixels per inch of screen.
The LG V35 ThinQ features a bit better processing power than OPPO A94 5G, although it has 2 GB lesser RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit. LG V35 ThinQ has a much bigger storage capacity to store more games and applications than OPPO A94 5G, because although it has less internal memory, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The OPPO A94 5G counts with a better camera than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not nice for low-light photography, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same video quality, the OPPO A94 5G also counts with a lot higher resolution back camera and a lot larger back camera sensor shooting way higher quality videos and photographs.
The OPPO A94 5G has longer battery performance than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has 4310mAh of battery capacity against 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.