Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-05-03 | 2019-03-15 |
| 6.30 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.10 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Cosmo Blue and Fluid Black | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| -- | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 800U MT6853 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC3 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4310mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.16 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A50 is better than the OPPO A94 5G, having a score of 83.8 against 74.1. The Galaxy A50 is an extremely older phone than the OPPO A94 5G, but Samsung could make it just a little bit lighter and a little thinner anyway. The OPPO A94 5G has a little faster CPU than Galaxy A50, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the OPPO A94 5G also has a greater amount of RAM.
OPPO A94 5G has a little bit better screen than Samsung Galaxy A50, and although they both have a same size display, the OPPO A94 5G also has a just a bit more pixels per inch in the screen and a bit higher 1080 x 2400px resolution. OPPO A94 5G has a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy A50, and although they both have the same diafragm aperture, the OPPO A94 5G also has a way larger sensor providing a way higher image quality, a much higher resolution camera and a lot higher video resolution.
The Galaxy A50 counts with a much greater memory to store more games and applications than OPPO A94 5G, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal memory capacity, the Galaxy A50 also has a slot for an SD memory card that holds a maximum of 512 GB. The OPPO A94 5G counts with just a bit longer battery duration than Galaxy A50, because it has 4310mAh of battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.