Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 91.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 12, 11 |
| 2021-05-03 | 2021-03-19 |
| 6.30 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.10 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Cosmo Blue and Fluid Black | -- |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 800U MT6853 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset |
| Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC3 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4310mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.16 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A52 5G is much better than the OPPO A94 5G, with a overall score of 91.3 against 74.1. Even being the best device in this comparison review, Galaxy A52 5G is a just a bit thicker and just a little heavier device than OPPO A94 5G. Both phones in our current comparison include Android operating system, but the Galaxy A52 5G has newer 12 version while OPPO A94 5G has Android 11.
OPPO A94 5G features a bit better performance than Galaxy A52 5G, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the OPPO A94 5G also has a larger amount of RAM. The OPPO A94 5G features a little more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy A52 5G, because although it has a bit smaller screen, and they both have the same exact 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution, the OPPO A94 5G also counts with a little bit greater display density.
Galaxy A52 5G counts with a much better memory for applications and games than OPPO A94 5G, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage, the Galaxy A52 5G also has a slot for external memory cards that holds a maximum of 1 TB. Galaxy A52 5G has a little bit better camera than OPPO A94 5G, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not recommended for taking pictures and video in low-light situations, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same video resolution, the Galaxy A52 5G also counts with a much more MP back camera and a bigger back camera sensor taking higher quality videos and photographs.
Galaxy A52 5G counts with just a bit better battery performance than OPPO A94 5G, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.