Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 79.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 5.1 |
| 2021-05-03 | 2015-08-13 |
| 6.30 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches | 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.10 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Cosmo Blue and Fluid Black | Black, Gold, Gray and White |
| -- | Glass; metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 415.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.8 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 800U MT6853 chipset | Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC3 GPU | ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU |
| 9.45 | 8.46 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.8 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4310mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 336 hours standby time 22 hours talk time |
| 6.16 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note 5 has a general score of 79.3, which is slightly better than the OPPO A94 5G's 74.1 overall score. The Galaxy Note 5 construction is just a little thinner and a little lighter than the OPPO A94 5G, even though it was released 6 years before. Both phones we compare here come with Android OS, but Galaxy Note 5 has 5.1 version and OPPO A94 5G has Android 11.
The OPPO A94 5G counts with a better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, because it has 4 GB more RAM and a higher number of cores. Galaxy Note 5 has just a bit better looking display than OPPO A94 5G, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a better resolution of 2560 x 1440 pixels and a higher pixel number in each inch in the display.
The OPPO A94 5G counts with a lot bigger memory to install applications and games than Galaxy Note 5, because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity. OPPO A94 5G counts with a really longer battery duration than Galaxy Note 5, because it has 4310mAh of battery capacity. OPPO A94 5G counts with a better camera than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the OPPO A94 5G also has a back camera with much more megapixels, a larger diafragm aperture to capture better captures and videos in poorly lited environments and a much bigger back-facing camera sensor providing a way better image quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.