Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 82.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 14 |
| 2021-05-03 | -- |
| 6.30 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches | -- |
| 6.10 ounces | -- |
| Cosmo Blue and Fluid Black | -- |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 800U MT6853 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC3 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.45 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 12.54 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4310mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.16 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S25 is better than OPPO A94 5G, having a global score of 82.6 against 74.1. Both devices in this review have Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy S25 has the newer 14 version while OPPO A94 5G has Android 11. The Samsung Galaxy S25 is a notably thinner and a lot lighter phone than the OPPO A94 5G.
The Samsung Galaxy S25 counts with a much better looking screen than OPPO A94 5G, because although it has a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2340 and a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a bit better number of pixels per display inch and much more screen brightness. The Samsung Galaxy S25's storage capacity for games and applications is very similar to the OPPO A94 5G one, they have equal internal memory.
The OPPO A94 5G counts with a way better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy S25. They have 8 GB of RAM and the same number of cores. OPPO A94 5G counts with a little better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy S25, because it has a 4310mAh battery capacity. The Galaxy S25 counts with just a bit better camera than OPPO A94 5G, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not favorable for low light photos and videos, it also counts with a much larger sensor providing a way higher image quality, a lot higher 7680x4320 video definition and a more megapixels back-facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.