Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-05-03 | 2020-01-31 |
| 6.30 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.10 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Cosmo Blue and Fluid Black | Black |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 411 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 800U MT6853 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC3 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4310mAh Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.16 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy XCover Pro is a little bit better than the OPPO A94 5G, having a general score of 81 against 74.1. Both phones in this review come with the same Android 11 OS (Operating System), so both should give you the same OS features. Even being the best in our current comparison, Galaxy XCover Pro is an older, notably thicker and much heavier cellphone than the OPPO A94 5G.
The OPPO A94 5G has a bit sharper screen than Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has a slightly better 1080 x 2400px resolution, a just a bit better quantity of pixels in each inch of screen and a little bit bigger screen. Galaxy XCover Pro counts with a better storage for games and applications than OPPO A94 5G, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD extension slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB.
OPPO A94 5G features a bit superior processing unit than Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the OPPO A94 5G also has 4 GB more RAM. OPPO A94 5G counts with just a little better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has a 4310mAh battery size. The OPPO A94 5G takes much better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have a F1.7 aperture, the OPPO A94 5G also has a much bigger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors, a way higher video resolution and a lot better resolution back camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.