Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 94.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-05-03 | 2020-09-18 |
| 6.30 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches | 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.10 ounces | 9.95 ounces |
| Cosmo Blue and Fluid Black | Mystic black and Mystic bronze |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | $ 1930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 800U MT6853 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC3 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4310mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.16 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Fold 2 has an overall score of 94.6, which is a lot better than the OPPO A94 5G's 74.1 general score. Both of these phones come with the same Android 11 OS. The Galaxy Z Fold 2 design is notably heavier but thinner than OPPO A94 5G, and they were only released with a couple months difference.
Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a bit superior CPU than OPPO A94 5G, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has a larger amount of RAM. OPPO A94 5G has a slightly better looking display than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has a little bit worse 1080 x 2400 resolution and a bit smaller display, it also counts with a quite better pixels density.
OPPO A94 5G takes slightly better photos and videos than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has lower video frame rate and a smaller sensor, and they both have the same video quality, the OPPO A94 5G also counts with a larger camera aperture for better low-light captures and video and a way better resolution back-facing camera.
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a very superior memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than OPPO A94 5G, because it has 128 GB more internal memory. Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a bit longer battery life than OPPO A94 5G, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 4310mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.