Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 57.8 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | LG |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow, 5.1 Lollipop | -- |
| 2016-08-03 | 2018-06-08 |
| 6.08 x 2.99 x 0.29 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.64 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black and Gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 270.00 | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 267 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek MT6750 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T860 MP2 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.64 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.03 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G) | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 4.8 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3075mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.04 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V35 ThinQ is a lot better than OPPO F1s, getting a global score of 81.3 against 57.8. The LG V35 ThinQ is a a little bit lighter device than OPPO F1s, but both of them are 0.29inches thick. The LG V35 ThinQ features a much better looking display than OPPO F1s, because it has a lot better pixels number per inch of display, a little bigger screen and a lot higher resolution of 1440 x 2880.
The LG V35 ThinQ counts with a better performance than OPPO F1s, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the LG V35 ThinQ also has more RAM. The LG V35 ThinQ counts with a lot bigger memory capacity to store more games and applications than OPPO F1s, because it has 64 GB internal storage capacity and a slot for SD memory cards that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB.
LG V35 ThinQ captures much better videos and photos than OPPO F1s, because although it has a smaller back-facing camera sensor offering a worse image quality, it also counts with a way bigger aperture for better low-light captures, a back facing camera with more megapixels and a way better 3840x2160 video definition.
LG V35 ThinQ features just a little bit longer battery life than OPPO F1s, because it has 3300mAh of battery capacity.
In addition to being the best phone in our current comparison, LG V35 ThinQ is also cheaper than the OPPO F1s, making it a simple decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.