Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 57.8 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | LG |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow, 5.1 Lollipop | -- |
| 2016-08-03 | 2020-05-15 |
| 6.08 x 2.99 x 0.29 inches | 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.64 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 270.00 | $ 264.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 267 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek MT6750 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T860 MP2 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 8.64 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.03 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G) | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 4.8 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3075mAh Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.04 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG Velvet is much better than OPPO F1s, having a overall score of 87.1 against 57.8. Although LG Velvet is extremely newer than OPPO F1s, it is heavier and just a little bit thicker. LG Velvet features a much better looking display than OPPO F1s, because it has a greater quantity of pixels per inch in the screen, a way better 1080 x 2460 pixels resolution and a bigger screen.
The LG Velvet features a much greater storage capacity for apps and games than OPPO F1s, because it has an external memory card slot that holds up to 1,95 TB and more internal memory. The LG Velvet has a bit superior processing unit than OPPO F1s, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the LG Velvet also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
The LG Velvet shoots greater pictures and videos than OPPO F1s, because it has a lot more MP back facing camera, a lot larger camera sensor shooting lot better quality photos and videos, a larger camera aperture to take better low-light images and videos and a much better video quality. LG Velvet has a much longer battery performance than OPPO F1s, because it has a 4300mAh battery size.
The LG Velvet is not only the best phones of the ones in this comparison, but it's also a bit cheaper, making this phone an easy choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.