Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 57.8 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow, 5.1 Lollipop | Android 11, 10 |
| 2016-08-03 | 2019-12-27 |
| 6.08 x 2.99 x 0.29 inches | 6.24 x 2.90 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.64 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 270.00 | $ 282.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 267 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek MT6750 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 1500 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-T860 MP2 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 8.64 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.03 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G) | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 4.8 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3075mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.04 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A51 has a global score of 85.5, which is much better than OPPO F1s's 57.8 overall score. The Samsung Galaxy A51 construction is extremely newer than OPPO F1s's, although it is a little bit heavier and a bit thicker. Both phones in our current comparison include Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy A51 has an older 11 version and OPPO F1s has Android 6.0 Marshmallow.
Galaxy A51 counts with a bit faster CPU than OPPO F1s, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy A51 also has 1 GB more RAM. The Galaxy A51 counts with a sharper display than OPPO F1s, because it has a lot higher pixels density, a larger display and a lot higher resolution of 1080 x 2400px.
The Galaxy A51 counts with a much better camera than OPPO F1s, because it has a much higher video quality, a bigger aperture to capture better low-light photos and videos, a much larger back camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a much higher resolution back facing camera. Galaxy A51 features a much greater storage to install applications and games than OPPO F1s, because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity and an external memory slot that holds up to 512 GB.
Galaxy A51 counts with superior battery life than OPPO F1s, because it has a 4000mAh battery size.
Samsung Galaxy A51 costs a little more money than the OPPO F1s, but it's still a convenient choice, because you can get a lot more features for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.