Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 64.5 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 4.3 | -- |
| 2014-03-19 | 2017-08-11 |
| 6.01 x 2.95 x 0.36 inches | 5.99 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.03 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Black and White | Gold and Gray |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 245.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 8974-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.8 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li-Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.1, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S8 Active is a lot better than the OPPO Find 7, having an 81.9 score against 64.5. The Galaxy S8 Active construction is incredibly newer, but just a bit thicker and somewhat heavier than the OPPO Find 7. OPPO Find 7 features a little better performance than Galaxy S8 Active, because although it has lesser processing cores and a lower amount of RAM, it also counts with an extra graphics processing unit.
The OPPO Find 7 has a little sharper screen than Galaxy S8 Active, although it has a little bit worse pixels amount per inch of display, a bit smaller screen and a quite lower 2560 x 1440 resolution. The Samsung Galaxy S8 Active has a lot bigger memory capacity to store more apps and games than OPPO Find 7, because it has 64 GB internal storage and an external memory slot that admits up to 256 GB.
Samsung Galaxy S8 Active features greater battery performance than OPPO Find 7, because it has a 4000mAh battery size instead of 3000mAh. Samsung Galaxy S8 Active features a slightly better camera than OPPO Find 7, because although it has a back-facing camera with lesser MP resolution and a worse video definition, it also counts with a larger aperture to capture better low-light photography and video and a bigger back-facing camera sensor taking better quality videos and pictures.
Despite of being the best phone between the ones we are comparing here, Samsung Galaxy S8 Active is also cheap compared to the other phone.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.