Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 61.5 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 4.3 | -- |
| 2014-03-19 | 2017-08-11 |
| 6.01 x 2.95 x 0.36 inches | 5.99 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.00 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Black and White | Gold and Gray |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 245.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 8974-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 6.72 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.8 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Li-Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.1, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S8 Active is a lot better than OPPO Find 7a, having a global score of 81.9 against 61.5. The Samsung Galaxy S8 Active body is way newer than OPPO Find 7a's, although it is just a little thicker and heavier. The Samsung Galaxy S8 Active has a processor that is very similar to OPPO Find 7a's CPU, because although the Samsung Galaxy S8 Active has doesn't have an additional graphics processor, it also counts with a higher number of faster cores and 2 GB more RAM memory.
Galaxy S8 Active features a display that's just as good as the screen in OPPO Find 7a, although the Galaxy S8 Active also has a better display pixel density, a lot better resolution of 1440 x 2960px and a quite larger display. Samsung Galaxy S8 Active counts with a bit better camera than OPPO Find 7a, because although it has a worse 3840x2160 video quality and a lower 12 megapixels resolution camera, it also counts with a bigger diafragm aperture to capture better captures in poorly lited situations and a larger sensor providing a higher image quality.
The Galaxy S8 Active features a superior storage capacity to install applications and games than OPPO Find 7a, because it has a SD memory card expansion slot that admits a maximum of 256 GB and 64 GB internal memory. Galaxy S8 Active features a much better battery lifetime than OPPO Find 7a, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity instead of 2800mAh.
The Galaxy S8 Active is not only the best phones in our current comparison, but it's also cheaper than the OPPO Find 7a.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.