Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Apple |
| Android 8.1 Oreo | -- |
| 2018-07-25 | 2017-11-03 |
| 6.17 x 2.92 x 0.38 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Blue and Red | Silver and Space gray |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1149.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 9.63 | 10.17 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3730mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.68 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone X has an overall score of 88.1, which is much better than OPPO Find X's 72.2 general score. The iPhone X construction is extremely thinner and a little bit lighter than OPPO Find X, even when both of them were only released with a few months difference. The iPhone X has a bit faster processing unit than OPPO Find X, because although it has an inferior number of cores and a smaller amount of RAM memory, it also counts with a 64 bits processing unit.
The Apple iPhone X counts with a little sharper display than OPPO Find X, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a quite better 1125 x 2436px resolution and a little higher pixels count in each inch of screen. Apple iPhone X features a camera that is very similar to the OPPO Find X one, because although the Apple iPhone X has a much less mega-pixels resolution back camera, a smaller sensor and a worse 3840x2160 video quality, it also counts with a bigger aperture.
Apple iPhone X's storage to install games and applications is just as good as the OPPO Find X one, both have exactly the same 256 GB internal storage capacity. OPPO Find X features a way better battery duration than iPhone X, because it has a 37 percent larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.