Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 82 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Apple |
| Android 8.1 Oreo | -- |
| 2018-07-25 | 2018-10-26 |
| 6.17 x 2.92 x 0.38 inches | 5.94 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| Blue and Red | Black, Blue, Red, Rose gold, White and Yellow |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1792 x 828 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 403 pixels per inch | 324 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 9.63 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3730mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2942mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.68 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone XR is much better than the OPPO Find X, having an 82 score against 72.2. Even though iPhone XR and OPPO Find X were released with only 3 months difference, iPhone XR's design is just a bit heavier but thinner. IPhone XR has a bit faster processor than OPPO Find X, because although it has a lower number of cores and also slower and less RAM memory, it also counts with a 64-bits CPU.
IPhone XR counts with a display that is just as good as the OPPO Find X one, although the iPhone XR has a lot worse resolution of 828 x 1792 pixels, a quite lower pixel density and a little bit smaller screen. OPPO Find X counts with a much greater storage capacity for apps and games than iPhone XR, because it has more internal storage.
The OPPO Find X features improved battery performance than iPhone XR, because it has a 27 percent greater battery size. The OPPO Find X and the iPhone XR both count with very similar cameras, because although the iPhone XR has a much lower 12 mega pixels resolution camera and a worse (4K) video quality, it also counts with a bigger camera aperture to take better low-light captures and a larger back-facing camera sensor taking higher quality videos and pictures.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.