Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | |
| Android 8.1 Oreo | -- |
| 2018-07-25 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.17 x 2.92 x 0.38 inches | 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| Blue and Red | Black, Pink and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 157.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 439 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3730mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.68 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 3 has a score of 80, which is better than OPPO Find X's global score of 72.2. The Google Pixel 3 body is notably lighter and somewhat thinner than the OPPO Find X, even when both of them were only released 3 months apart. The OPPO Find X features a little bit better hardware performance than Google Pixel 3, and although they both have the same number of cores, the OPPO Find X also has a larger amount of RAM.
Google Pixel 3 features a little bit better screen than OPPO Find X, because although it has a bit smaller screen and a bit lower 1080 x 2160 pixels resolution, it also counts with a just a little greater pixels density. OPPO Find X takes a little bit better videos and photos than Google Pixel 3, because although it has a tinier camera aperture and a smaller sensor taking worse quality photos and videos, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and the same video frame rate, the OPPO Find X also counts with a much more mega-pixels camera.
OPPO Find X counts with a much better storage for games and applications than Google Pixel 3, because it has 256 GB internal storage. The OPPO Find X features superior battery duration than Google Pixel 3, because it has a 28 percent bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.