Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | |
| Android 8.1 Oreo | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2018-07-25 | 2019-05-07 |
| 6.17 x 2.92 x 0.38 inches | 5.96 x 2.76 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 5.19 ounces |
| Blue and Red | Black, Purple and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 186.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 615 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3730mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.68 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 3a has an overall score of 78.8, which is a little bit better than the OPPO Find X's 72.2 global score. The Google Pixel 3a is a newer cellphone, and it's also thinner and much lighter than the OPPO Find X. Both devices in this comparison review use Android OS, but Google Pixel 3a has the older 11 version and OPPO Find X has Android 8.1 Oreo.
Google Pixel 3a has a screen that is very similar to OPPO Find X's screen, because although the Google Pixel 3a has a little bit smaller screen and a little bit worse 1080 x 2220 resolution, it also counts with a little more pixels per screen inch. OPPO Find X has much more storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Google Pixel 3a, because it has 256 GB internal storage.
OPPO Find X counts with just a bit better processing power than Google Pixel 3a, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the OPPO Find X also has a higher amount of RAM memory. OPPO Find X captures just a bit better photos and videos than Google Pixel 3a, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture and a tinier sensor taking less light and duller colors, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the OPPO Find X also counts with a lot higher resolution back-facing camera.
OPPO Find X features superior battery duration than Google Pixel 3a, because it has a 24% more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.