Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | |
| Android 8.1 Oreo | Android 11, 10 |
| 2018-07-25 | 2020-08-20 |
| 6.17 x 2.92 x 0.38 inches | 5.67 x 2.73 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Blue and Red | Just black |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 349.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AA chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3730mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3140mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.68 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4a is much better than OPPO Find X, with a score of 82.9 against 72.2. Google Pixel 4a's construction is much newer, notably lighter and thinner than OPPO Find X. Both phones we compare here use Android OS, but the Google Pixel 4a has older 11 version and OPPO Find X has Android 8.1 Oreo version.
Google Pixel 4a has a little bit better display than OPPO Find X, because although it has a quite smaller display, and they both have the same exact resolution of 1080 x 2340px, the Google Pixel 4a also counts with a quite higher screen pixel density. The OPPO Find X has a little faster processor than Google Pixel 4a, and although they both have 8 cores, the OPPO Find X also has 2 GB more RAM memory.
The OPPO Find X has much more storage to store more games and applications than Google Pixel 4a, because it has more internal storage. The OPPO Find X captures a bit better photographs and videos than Google Pixel 4a, because although it has a tinier camera aperture and a tinier camera sensor offering a worse image quality, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same video definition, the OPPO Find X also counts with a camera with a lot higher 16 mega pixels resolution.
The OPPO Find X has superior battery life than Google Pixel 4a, because it has 3730mAh of battery capacity against 3140mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.