Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | HTC |
| Android 8.1 Oreo | -- |
| 2018-07-25 | 2017-02-21 |
| 6.17 x 2.92 x 0.38 inches | 6.39 x 3.14 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| Blue and Red | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | S-LCD 5 |
| 403 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.63 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3730mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.68 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The HTC U Ultra is a bit better than the OPPO Find X, having a 77 score against 72.2. The HTC U Ultra body is somewhat thinner and a little lighter than OPPO Find X, even though it was released about 17 months before. HTC U Ultra counts with a bit sharper screen than OPPO Find X, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a better screen pixel density and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560px.
The OPPO Find X has a bit better processing unit than HTC U Ultra, because it has a greater number of cores (and faster) and 4 GB more RAM memory. The HTC U Ultra counts with a better storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than OPPO Find X, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with a SD extension slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB.
OPPO Find X counts with improved battery life than HTC U Ultra, because it has a 3730mAh battery capacity against 3000mAh. The OPPO Find X captures clearer photos and videos than HTC U Ultra, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not recommended for shooting pictures and video in low-light situations and a tinier sensor which offers a lower photo and video quality, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and the same video frame rate, the OPPO Find X also counts with a much better resolution back facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.