Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | HTC |
| Android 8.1 Oreo | -- |
| 2018-07-25 | 2017-05-18 |
| 6.17 x 2.92 x 0.38 inches | 6.06 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Blue and Red | Black, Blue, Silver and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 275.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | S-LCD 5 |
| 403 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 10.02 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3730mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.68 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
HTC U11 has a global score of 77.6, which is a bit better than OPPO Find X's 72.2 global score. Despite of the fact that the HTC U11 is older than the OPPO Find X, it's body is a bit lighter and somewhat thinner. OPPO Find X has a bit better hardware performance than HTC U11, and although they both have 8 cores, the OPPO Find X also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
HTC U11 counts with a little sharper screen than OPPO Find X, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a greater count of pixels per inch in the screen and a better 1440 x 2560 resolution. OPPO Find X captures a little bit better photos and videos than HTC U11, because although it has a tinier back-facing camera sensor capturing less light and duller colors and a smaller aperture which is not nice for shooting photos in low-light situations, and they both have the same video quality and the same video frame rates, the OPPO Find X also counts with a way more megapixels camera.
OPPO Find X features a way bigger storage capacity for applications and games than HTC U11, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity. OPPO Find X has improved battery life than HTC U11, because it has a 24% more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.