Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | LG |
| Android 8.1 Oreo | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2018-07-25 | 2018-03-09 |
| 6.17 x 2.92 x 0.38 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Blue and Red | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3730mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.68 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
LG V30S ThinQ has a score of 82.5, which is much better than the OPPO Find X's score of 72.2. Even though LG V30S ThinQ and OPPO Find X were released with only 5 months difference, LG V30S ThinQ is somewhat lighter and thinner. Both phones in this comparison come with Android operating system, but LG V30S ThinQ has 8.0 Oreo version while OPPO Find X has Android 8.1 Oreo.
LG V30S ThinQ counts with a slightly better screen than OPPO Find X, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2880 and a greater pixel density. LG V30S ThinQ has a way bigger memory to store more apps and games than OPPO Find X, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with a SD extension slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB.
OPPO Find X counts with a little faster processor than LG V30S ThinQ, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the OPPO Find X also has a larger amount of RAM. OPPO Find X counts with a bit superior battery life than LG V30S ThinQ, because it has a 3730mAh battery capacity. OPPO Find X shoots a little bit better photographs and videos than LG V30S ThinQ, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not recommended for capturing pictures or video in poorly lited environments, and they both have the same (4K) video definition, a same resolution back facing camera and the same video frame rates, the OPPO Find X also counts with a bigger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.