Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | LG |
| Android 8.1 Oreo | -- |
| 2018-07-25 | 2018-06-08 |
| 6.17 x 2.92 x 0.38 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Blue and Red | Black and Gray |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3730mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.68 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V35 ThinQ has an overall score of 81.3, which is better than OPPO Find X's 72.2 global score. The LG V35 ThinQ body is lighter and notably thinner than the OPPO Find X, even when they were released with only a couple of months difference. The LG V35 ThinQ features a little bit better looking display than OPPO Find X, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2880 resolution and a greater quantity of pixels per inch in the screen.
LG V35 ThinQ and OPPO Find X count with really similar processors, and although the LG V35 ThinQ has less RAM, they both have the same number of cores. The OPPO Find X counts with a slightly better camera than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not recommended for low light captures and videos, and they both have the same video frame rate, a same resolution back camera and the same 3840x2160 video definition, the OPPO Find X also counts with a bigger camera sensor providing a better image quality.
LG V35 ThinQ counts with a quite bigger storage for games and applications than OPPO Find X, because although it has just 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with an external SD slot that supports up to 1,95 TB. The OPPO Find X counts with a bit better battery life than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has a 13 percent larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.