Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | LG |
| Android 8.1 Oreo | -- |
| 2018-07-25 | 2020-05-15 |
| 6.17 x 2.92 x 0.38 inches | 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Blue and Red | Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 264.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3730mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.68 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG Velvet is much better than OPPO Find X, getting a global score of 87.1 against 72.2. The LG Velvet design is newer, thinner and a little bit lighter than the OPPO Find X. The OPPO Find X features just a bit better screen than LG Velvet, because although it has a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels and a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a bit more pixels per inch in the screen.
The LG Velvet features a much greater memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than OPPO Find X, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD memory slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. OPPO Find X counts with a little faster CPU than LG Velvet, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the OPPO Find X also has 2 GB more RAM.
The LG Velvet counts with just a bit longer battery lifetime than OPPO Find X, because it has a 4300mAh battery size. The LG Velvet shoots much better pictures and videos than OPPO Find X, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the LG Velvet also has a back-facing camera with a way better resolution, a lot larger camera sensor and a bigger diafragm aperture for better low light photos and video.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.