Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 8.1 Oreo | -- |
| 2018-07-25 | 2017-01-13 |
| 6.17 x 2.92 x 0.38 inches | 5.75 x 2.81 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 5.61 ounces |
| Blue and Red | Black sky, Blue mist, Gold sand and Peach cloud |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 424 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7880 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1900 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Mali-T830 MP3 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 8.88 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.12 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3730mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.68 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A5 (2017) is a little bit better than OPPO Find X, getting a global score of 75.8 against 72.2. The Galaxy A5 (2017) is an older device than the OPPO Find X, but it's somewhat thinner and lighter anyway. OPPO Find X features a little faster processor than Samsung Galaxy A5 (2017), and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the OPPO Find X also has a larger amount of RAM.
The OPPO Find X counts with a slightly better looking screen than Galaxy A5 (2017), because although it has a just a bit worse screen pixels density, it also counts with a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels and a larger display. The OPPO Find X has a lot bigger storage capacity to store more games and applications than Galaxy A5 (2017), because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory capacity.
OPPO Find X features just a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy A5 (2017), because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture, and they both have a same resolution camera in the back, the OPPO Find X also counts with a much higher (4K) video definition. The OPPO Find X features greater battery performance than Galaxy A5 (2017), because it has a 24 percent more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.