Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 8.1 Oreo | -- |
| 2018-07-25 | 2019-03-15 |
| 6.17 x 2.92 x 0.38 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Blue and Red | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3730mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.68 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A50 has a score of 83.8, which is much better than the OPPO Find X's overall score of 72.2. Galaxy A50's design is thinner and lighter than OPPO Find X, even though both of them were released with only a few months difference. OPPO Find X features a bit better processing power than Samsung Galaxy A50, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the OPPO Find X also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
The OPPO Find X has a bit sharper screen than Galaxy A50. They have the same exact 1080 x 2340 resolution, a same size display and the same quantity of pixels per inch in the display. Galaxy A50 has a camera that is just as good as the camera in OPPO Find X, because although the Galaxy A50 has a tinier sensor giving a lower image quality, and they both have the same video definition and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, it also counts with a back camera with way more MP and a bigger diafragm aperture.
Galaxy A50 has just a bit bigger storage capacity to install applications and games than OPPO Find X, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that holds a maximum of 512 GB. Samsung Galaxy A50 features just a bit better battery lifetime than OPPO Find X, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.