Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 91.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 8.1 Oreo | Android 12, 11 |
| 2018-07-25 | 2021-03-19 |
| 6.17 x 2.92 x 0.38 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Blue and Red | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3730mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.68 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A52 5G has a score of 91.3, which is way better than OPPO Find X's global score of 72.2. The Galaxy A52 5G design is way newer and thinner, but also a little bit heavier than the OPPO Find X. Both phones in this comparison review use Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy A52 5G has the previous 12 version and OPPO Find X has Android 8.1 Oreo.
OPPO Find X features a bit better processing unit than Galaxy A52 5G, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the OPPO Find X also has more RAM. The OPPO Find X features a little sharper screen than Galaxy A52 5G, although it has a little bit lower 1080 x 2340px resolution, a quite smaller display and a bit worse screen density.
Galaxy A52 5G has a better memory capacity for games and applications than OPPO Find X, because although it has just 128 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that holds a maximum of 1 TB. The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has improved battery lifetime than OPPO Find X, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Galaxy A52 5G shoots much clearer pictures and videos than OPPO Find X, and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same video definition, the Galaxy A52 5G also has a way bigger sensor shooting way better quality photographs and videos, a larger camera aperture to capture better low light images and videos and a back camera with a way better 64 mega pixels resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.