Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 97.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 8.1 Oreo | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2018-07-25 | 2019-09-27 |
| 6.17 x 2.92 x 0.38 inches | 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 9.74 ounces |
| Blue and Red | Cosmos black and Space silver |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1980.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 7.3 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2152 x 1536 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 362 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3730mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.68 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Fold has a general score of 97.6, which is a lot better than OPPO Find X's score of 72.2. Both phones in this review include Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy Fold has a newer 9.0 Pie version while OPPO Find X has Android 8.1 Oreo version, so it gives some nice extra features. Samsung Galaxy Fold's body is newer and extremely thinner, but also noticeably heavier than OPPO Find X.
The OPPO Find X has a little bit better screen than Galaxy Fold, because although it has a bit smaller display and a little bit lower 1080 x 2340 resolution, it also counts with a bit better pixels amount per display inch. Samsung Galaxy Fold counts with a way bigger storage capacity for games and applications than OPPO Find X, because it has more internal memory capacity.
Galaxy Fold has a little faster processing unit than OPPO Find X, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Fold also has a higher amount of RAM memory. The Samsung Galaxy Fold counts with just a bit better camera than OPPO Find X, because although it has a much lower resolution back-facing camera and a worse video definition, it also counts with a lot bigger diafragm aperture and a bigger back camera sensor.
The Galaxy Fold has just a little better battery lifetime than OPPO Find X, because it has a 17% bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.