Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 98.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 8.1 Oreo | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2018-07-25 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.17 x 2.92 x 0.38 inches | 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Blue and Red | Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 494 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 13.64 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3730mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.68 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a score of 98.9, which is much better than the OPPO Find X's 72.2 general score. These devices work with Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has 13 version while OPPO Find X has Android 8.1 Oreo. Galaxy Note 20 Ultra's body is notably newer and somewhat thinner, but also somewhat heavier than the OPPO Find X.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a bit better screen than OPPO Find X, because it has a better 1440 x 3088 resolution, a quite higher amount of pixels per inch in the display and a quite bigger screen. Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features more memory to install applications and games than OPPO Find X, because although it has just 128 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that holds a maximum of 1000 GB.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with just a little better performance than OPPO Find X, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has more RAM memory. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a much better camera than OPPO Find X, because it has a way more mega-pixels back-facing camera, a way higher 7680x4320 video quality, a bigger aperture for better photography and video in low-light environments and a way larger sensor taking much better quality pictures and videos.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features better battery lifetime than OPPO Find X, because it has a 21 percent bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.