Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 79.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 8.1 Oreo | Android 5.1 |
| 2018-07-25 | 2015-08-13 |
| 6.17 x 2.92 x 0.38 inches | 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Blue and Red | Black, Gold, Gray and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass; metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 415.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.2 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU |
| 9.63 | 8.46 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.8 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3730mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 336 hours standby time 22 hours talk time |
| 5.68 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note 5 has a general score of 79.3, which is just a bit better than OPPO Find X's 72.2 score. Both devices in this comparison review work with Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy Note 5 has the older 5.1 version while OPPO Find X has Android 8.1 Oreo version. The Galaxy Note 5 body is a bit lighter and much thinner than OPPO Find X, despite of the fact that it was released 3 years before.
OPPO Find X counts with a greater performance than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, because it has more RAM and a larger number of cores. Galaxy Note 5 counts with a more vivid screen than OPPO Find X, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a higher resolution of 2560 x 1440px and a higher pixels density.
The OPPO Find X has a very superior memory capacity for games and applications than Galaxy Note 5, because it has 256 GB internal memory. OPPO Find X shoots a little bit better pictures and videos than Galaxy Note 5, although it has a tinier aperture which is worse for shooting photos or video in poorly lited environments, they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, a same resolution back camera, a same size sensor and the same 3840x2160 video resolution.
OPPO Find X features improved battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, because it has a 3730mAh battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.