Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 80.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 8.1 Oreo | -- |
| 2018-07-25 | 2017-07-07 |
| 6.17 x 2.92 x 0.38 inches | 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Blue and Red | Black, Blue, Gold and Silver |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 611.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Exynos M1and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Mali-T880 MP12 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.12 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3730mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.68 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition is better than the OPPO Find X, having an 80.4 score against 72.2. The Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition is an older cellphone than the OPPO Find X, but it is lighter and thinner anyway. The Galaxy Note Fan Edition counts with a little more vivid display than OPPO Find X, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2560 resolution and a greater pixels density.
The OPPO Find X features a much better memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with more internal storage capacity. OPPO Find X features just a little better processing power than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, and although they both have 8 cores, the OPPO Find X also has more RAM.
OPPO Find X counts with a little better battery life than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has a 17 percent larger battery size. The OPPO Find X has a little bit better camera than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because although it has a tinier sensor shooting worse quality videos and photographs and a smaller aperture which is not favorable for low-light photos and videos, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the OPPO Find X also counts with a back camera with a lot better resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.