Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 80.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 8.1 Oreo | -- |
| 2018-07-25 | 2015-08-21 |
| 6.17 x 2.92 x 0.38 inches | 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Blue and Red | Black sapphire, Gold platinum, Silver titan and White pearl |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2100 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Mali-T760 MP8 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3730mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.68 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note5 has an overall score of 80.2, which is better than OPPO Find X's global score of 72.2. Galaxy Note5 is an incredibly older phone than OPPO Find X, but it is way thinner and a bit lighter anyway. The OPPO Find X features a bit better CPU than Samsung Galaxy Note5, and although they both have 8 cores, the OPPO Find X also has more RAM memory.
Samsung Galaxy Note5 features a little bit better looking screen than OPPO Find X, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a greater pixels density and a higher 1440 x 2560 resolution. OPPO Find X has much more storage capacity to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Note5, because it has 192 GB more internal memory.
OPPO Find X captures just a bit better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note5, although it has a tinier aperture, they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates, the same 3840x2160 video definition, a same resolution camera and a 0.38 inches back-facing camera sensor. OPPO Find X has better battery lifetime than Galaxy Note5, because it has a 3730mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.