Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 8.1 Oreo | -- |
| 2018-07-25 | 2016-06-10 |
| 6.17 x 2.92 x 0.38 inches | 5.86 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Blue and Red | Camo green, Sandy gold and Titanium gray |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 247.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.63 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | HSPA |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3730mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.68 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S7 Active is slightly better than the OPPO Find X, having a 75.8 score against 72.2. Despite of the fact the Galaxy S7 Active is much older and just a bit thicker than OPPO Find X, it's construction is still just a little lighter. The OPPO Find X counts with a little bit better performance than Galaxy S7 Active, because it has a larger number of cores and 4 GB more RAM memory.
Samsung Galaxy S7 Active counts with a brighter display than OPPO Find X, because although it has a really smaller screen, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560px and more pixels per display inch. OPPO Find X features a way bigger storage to install games and applications than Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 224 GB more internal memory capacity.
The Galaxy S7 Active has a little longer battery duration than OPPO Find X, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity against 3730mAh. OPPO Find X captures a bit better pictures and videos than Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has a tinier camera aperture, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same video definition, the OPPO Find X also counts with a lot higher resolution back-facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.