Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 8.1 Oreo | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2018-07-25 | 2020-04-04 |
| 6.17 x 2.92 x 0.38 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| Blue and Red | Black |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | -- |
| 403 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.12 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3730mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.68 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy XCover FieldPro is much better than OPPO Find X, with an 80.1 score against 72.2. Although Galaxy XCover FieldPro is newer than the OPPO Find X, it is much thicker and extremely heavier. Both of these phones work with Android operating system, but the Galaxy XCover FieldPro has 8.0 Oreo version and OPPO Find X has Android 8.1 Oreo.
OPPO Find X has just a bit better hardware performance than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, and although they both have 8 cores, the OPPO Find X also has a greater amount of RAM. The Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a bit sharper display than OPPO Find X, because although it has a way smaller screen, it also counts with a greater display density and a higher 1440 x 2560 resolution.
The OPPO Find X has more storage capacity to store more apps and games than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory. Galaxy XCover FieldPro has better battery life than OPPO Find X, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity. OPPO Find X takes much better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a lot tinier aperture and a tinier sensor taking less light and duller colors, it also counts with a back facing camera with a way higher resolution and a way better video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.