Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 8.1 Oreo | Android 11, 10 |
| 2018-07-25 | 2020-01-31 |
| 6.17 x 2.92 x 0.38 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Blue and Red | Black |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 403 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3730mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.68 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro is much better than the OPPO Find X, getting an 81 score against 72.2. Both of these phones include Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has an older 11 version and OPPO Find X has Android 8.1 Oreo version. Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro is a newer device than OPPO Find X, although it is heavier and a little thicker.
OPPO Find X counts with a bit better processing power than Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the OPPO Find X also has a greater amount of RAM. OPPO Find X counts with a little more vivid display than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a just a little worse pixel density, and they both have an equal 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution, the OPPO Find X also counts with a little larger display.
OPPO Find X features a little bit better camera than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a smaller camera aperture and a way less MP back facing camera, it also counts with a much higher 3840x2160 video resolution and a lot larger camera sensor. The OPPO Find X features a better storage to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with more internal storage.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has a little better battery performance than OPPO Find X, because it has 4050mAh of battery capacity against 3730mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.