Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 94.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 8.1 Oreo | Android 11, 10 |
| 2018-07-25 | 2020-09-18 |
| 6.17 x 2.92 x 0.38 inches | 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 9.95 ounces |
| Blue and Red | Mystic black and Mystic bronze |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3730mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.68 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 is much better than OPPO Find X, with a 94.6 score against 72.2. Although Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 is a lot heavier than the OPPO Find X, it's way thinner and also extremely newer. Both of these devices use Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has older 11 version while OPPO Find X has Android 8.1 Oreo version.
The OPPO Find X has a little bit better looking display than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has a little smaller display and a lot worse 1080 x 2340px resolution, it also counts with a just a little higher number of pixels per inch of display. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 features as much storage capacity for apps and games as OPPO Find X, both have the same 256 GB internal memory capacity.
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a bit faster CPU than OPPO Find X, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has a greater amount of RAM memory. The Galaxy Z Fold 2 captures a bit better photographs and videos than OPPO Find X, because although it has a lower 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and a back camera with a much lower 12 mega pixels resolution, it also counts with a much bigger camera sensor providing a lot higher image quality and a bigger camera aperture.
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 has greater battery lifetime than OPPO Find X, because it has a 4500mAh battery size instead of 3730mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.