Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Xiaomi |
| Android 8.1 Oreo | -- |
| 2018-07-25 | 2018-04-03 |
| 6.17 x 2.92 x 0.38 inches | 5.94 x 2.95 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Blue and Red | Black and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Ceramic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 639.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 403 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3730mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3400mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.68 | 5.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s is better than OPPO Find X, having an 83.8 score against 72.2. Although Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s and OPPO Find X were released with only a couple of months difference, Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s's body is just a bit heavier but somewhat thinner. The OPPO Find X features a bit sharper screen than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, because it has a bit higher display density, a quite larger display and a bit higher 1080 x 2340 resolution.
The Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s and OPPO Find X feature really similar memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos, both of them have exactly the same internal storage capacity. Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s and OPPO Find X both have extremely similar processing units, they have the same RAM memory amount and a Octa-Core processor.
OPPO Find X has a slightly better camera than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture and a smaller back camera sensor capturing worse quality photos, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the OPPO Find X also counts with a much higher 16 megapixels resolution camera in the back.
The OPPO Find X has just a bit longer battery life than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, because it has 3730mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.