Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Xiaomi |
| Android 8.1 Oreo | Android 10 |
| 2018-07-25 | 2020-09-08 |
| 6.17 x 2.92 x 0.38 inches | 6.51 x 3.02 x 0.37 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 7.58 ounces |
| Blue and Red | Cobalt blue and Shadow gray |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 403 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 450 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G SM7150-AC chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3730mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5160mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.68 | 6.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC is much better than the OPPO Find X, with a score of 81.6 against 72.2. Both phones in this review work with Android OS, but Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC has the previous 10 version and OPPO Find X has Android 8.1 Oreo. The Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC design is noticeably newer and just a little thinner than the OPPO Find X's, although it's somewhat heavier.
The OPPO Find X has a little better processing power than Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, and although they both have the same number of cores, the OPPO Find X also has 2 GB more RAM memory. The Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC features a bit better looking screen than OPPO Find X, because although it has a quite inferior pixels number per inch in the display, it also counts with a quite better 1080 x 2400px resolution and a little bigger screen.
The Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC shoots much better photos and videos than OPPO Find X, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution and the same video frame rate, the Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC also has a lot larger camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors, a camera in the back with lot more mega-pixels and a bigger aperture to capture better low-light photography.
The OPPO Find X features a very superior memory capacity to store more apps and games than Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory. Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC counts with a really longer battery duration than OPPO Find X, because it has a 5160mAh battery capacity against 3730mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.