Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 91.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Xiaomi |
| Android 8.1 Oreo | Android 12 |
| 2018-07-25 | 2022-11-01 |
| 6.17 x 2.92 x 0.38 inches | 6.41 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 7.32 ounces |
| Blue and Red | Black |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 900 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 1080 MT6877V (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Octa-Core 2600 MHz processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 13.97 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3730mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4300mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.68 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer has a score of 91.5, which is way better than OPPO Find X's 72.2 overall score. Both of these devices use Android OS (operating system), but Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer has the older 12 version while OPPO Find X has Android 8.1 Oreo version. Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer is a notably newer and just a bit thinner device than the OPPO Find X, although it's somewhat heavier.
The OPPO Find X counts with a bit better CPU than Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer. Both have 8 GB of RAM memory and a Octa-Core CPU. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer counts with just a bit better screen than OPPO Find X, because although it has a bit worse quantity of pixels per screen inch, it also counts with a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 and a quite bigger screen.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer has as much memory to store more apps and games as the OPPO Find X, both of them have exactly the same 256 GB internal storage. Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer counts with a much better camera than OPPO Find X, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer also has a bigger diafragm aperture to take better low light captures and videos, a lot larger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a back camera with lot more mega pixels.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer has a little longer battery performance than OPPO Find X, because it has 4300mAh of battery capacity against 3730mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.