Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 81.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Xiaomi |
| Android 8.1 Oreo | Android 10 |
| 2018-07-25 | 2020-05-05 |
| 6.17 x 2.92 x 0.38 inches | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Blue and Red | Glacier white, Interstellar gray and Tropical green |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 291.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 403 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3730mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.68 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a global score of 81.1, which is much better than OPPO Find X's overall score of 72.2. Both of these phones use Android operating system, but Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has the older 10 version while OPPO Find X has Android 8.1 Oreo. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro's body is newer and just a little thinner than the OPPO Find X's, but it's also somewhat heavier.
OPPO Find X has a little better performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the OPPO Find X also has a larger amount of RAM memory. The OPPO Find X counts with a bit sharper screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, because although it has a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels and a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a bit more pixels per inch of display.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro takes better photos and videos than OPPO Find X, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also has a way bigger back camera sensor which gives a way higher photo and video quality, a larger aperture and a lot more MP camera.
OPPO Find X has a greater memory for applications and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 192 GB more internal storage. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro features improved battery lifetime than OPPO Find X, because it has a 35% bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.