Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 79 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Xiaomi |
| Android 8.1 Oreo | Android 11, 10 |
| 2018-07-25 | 2020-04-07 |
| 6.17 x 2.92 x 0.38 inches | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Blue and Red | Aurora blue, Glacier white and Interstellar grey |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 249.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 403 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3730mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.68 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S has a general score of 79, which is a bit better than the OPPO Find X's global score of 72.2. Both devices in this comparison review work with Android OS (operating system), but Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S has the older 11 version and OPPO Find X has Android 8.1 Oreo. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S body is newer and a bit thinner than OPPO Find X's, although it is also somewhat heavier.
OPPO Find X features a little faster processing unit than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, and although they both have the same number of cores, the OPPO Find X also has 4 GB more RAM memory. OPPO Find X has a bit more vivid screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, because although it has a little smaller screen and a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels, it also counts with a little bit better quantity of pixels per inch in the display.
The OPPO Find X features a quite bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 192 GB more internal memory capacity. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S has superior battery performance than OPPO Find X, because it has a 5020mAh battery size.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S captures much clearer pictures and videos than OPPO Find X, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same (4K) video resolution, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S also has a bigger diafragm aperture, a lot more MP back camera and a lot larger sensor shooting way higher quality videos and photographs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.